HomeChannelsDeGRAM Forex Signals and Forecast — Dec 2025

Article · degram-forex-signals

DeGRAM Forex Signals and Forecast review @degram-forex-signals

Two angles on the same channel: a qualitative “scam or legit?” review, and a data-first backtest review (one year of tracked signals). Free signals cover EURUSD and GOLD, but execution is tricky and reported performance is negative.

Updated: Dec 2025~6 min readChannel: degram-forex-signals
Channel rating:3.1
Go to channel
DeGRAM Forex Signals

Focus

EURUSD + GOLD (XAUUSD)

Style

Forecasts (4H–1D), some day/swing signals

Overall verdict

Free signals are net negative

1) What the channel is (content + positioning)

Free Telegram channel centered on EURUSD and GOLD. Reviews describe frequent forecasts and signals, with a tilt toward swing-style setups (4H–1D) that can take longer to complete. One recurring complaint: stop-loss is sometimes missing, making execution harder for day traders. This review keeps the focus on how those patterns affect real outcomes.

What you typically get

  • Directional forecasts with key levels
  • MT4 screenshots / trade result screenshots (real vs demo not always clear)
  • High posting cadence (claims of ~3 forecasts per day, ~1000 views each)

2) Snapshot: two sources side by side

MetricData/backtest viewQualitative view
Years active6 yearsMore than 5 years
Subscribers11,716Over 12,500
MarketsEURUSD + GOLDForex + gold
SessionsLondonLondon + New York
Posting cadence~2 signals/day~3 forecasts/day
Trust / verdict"Back Testing Results: BAD"5/10 trust; not a scam, limited use

3) “Verified” performance (free signals)

12-month backtest

One full-year dataset reports 478 free signals with a 25% win rate and -5,592 pips. The review points to a win-rate vs payoff mismatch as the core issue, yielding negative expectancy despite some large winners.

Backtest summary

  • Period01.09.2024 – 01.09.2025
  • Free signals counted478
  • Win rate25%
  • Net result (pips)-5,592 pips
  • Avg profit per signal~70 pips
  • Avg holding time~8 hours
  • Avg profit/week-107 pips
  • VerdictNegative expectancy

Best vs worst free signals

Best

+142 (Gold)+138 (Gold)+132 (EURUSD)+128 (EURUSD)

Worst

-49 (Gold)-47 (EURUSD)-46 (EURUSD)-45 (Gold)

4) Monthly free-signal table (Sep 2024 → Aug 2025)

MonthWin rateSignalsAvg profit (pips)Net pips
Sep 202426%4068.4-403
Oct 202426%4269-387
Nov 202423%3972.2-435
Dec 202426%3468.5-290
Jan 202520%4071-664
Feb 202528%3967.8-258
Mar 202521%4072.1-657
Apr 202522%4170.4-568
May 202531%3967.6-166
Jun 202523%4070.1-470
Jul 202525%4469.8-495
Aug 202523%4072.4-599

High volatility: singles can spike above +140 pips or drop to the mid -40s, yet month-end sums stay negative.

We do not recommend following these forex signals.

The free signals in this review show negative expectancy and high variance. Use this article for awareness, not as trading advice.

5) Red flags and community feedback

  • Free-signal win rate sits around 25% in the dataset; negative net pips.
  • Stops are sometimes missing; targets can take days, making execution harder for intraday traders.
  • Trust score around mid-level (5/10); described as “not a scam, but limited use.”
  • Reports of impostor/fake accounts — only use official links.
  • Some optimistic reader claims conflict with the backtest results.

6) Why the two reviews diverge

  • Counting “forecasts” vs “signals” differently.
  • Assumptions about entries, partial TPs, and missing SL.
  • Reader-reported results vs strict “count every call” backtesting.

Both agree the channel is active and established; both also imply the free content is hard to execute mechanically and the edge is unclear.

7) Takeaway (50/50)

  1. Established, active feed; covers EURUSD and gold.
  2. Forecast-heavy format; stops may be missing; targets can be slow.
  3. Stats: 478 free signals, 25% win, -5,592 pips; every tracked month negative.
  4. Execution friction (no SL, swing timing) makes copy-trading difficult.
  5. Bottom line: free signals show negative expectancy; treat forecasts cautiously.