Best Telegram Forex Signals

HomeChannelsEasy Forex OFFICIAL CHANNEL - Nov 2025 snapshot

Article · easy-forex-pips

Easy Forex OFFICIAL CHANNEL review— @EasyForexPips

A blended review of the channel based on two sources: what shows up in the feed, how signals are formatted, and what backtests of free signals report (23% win rate, -12,994 pips over a 12-month sample). Bottom line: huge audience and high activity, but free signals remain net negative.

Updated: Nov 2025~6 min readChannel: EasyForexPips
Channel rating:3.0
Go to channel
Easy Forex OFFICIAL CHANNEL

Focus

Major + minor FX pairs; London session emphasis

Free signals per day

~1/day (both sources)

Overall verdict

Free signals are net negative

1) What is inside this group?

Two sources outline a very active FX signals feed that posts one free signal per day, shows trade results, shares reposts from the paid/private feed, and promotes a broker and related channels. Both emphasize London-session timing and a mix of day, swing, and occasional scalp positioning.

Typical signal format (as described)

  • Entry levels or zone
  • Stop loss
  • Three take-profits (TP1/TP2/TP3)
  • Style note: 4H swing framing; smaller TPs for scalpers/day traders can have weak reward-to-risk

Context for SEO readers: this review fits the broader search for best free/VIP forex signals channels or groups on Telegram; in this case the free feed remains negative in backtesting.

At a glance (two snapshots)

MetricSnapshot ASnapshot B
UpdatedNov 17, 2025 (verified stats)Sep 8, 2025 (pro review)
Started7 full years of operationLaunched Feb 8, 2018
Subscribers309,979317,000+
Posting frequency-~11 posts/day
Avg views/post-~10,000 (~3.15% engagement)
Free signals/day11
Session focusLondonLondon
Trust ratingBad (verified stats)3/10 trust score

2) Free signals backtesting results

12-month backtest

The verified-stats dataset covers 08.09.2024 - 08.09.2025: 624 free signals, 23% win rate, and -12,994 pips (about -249.88 pips per week). A professional review reports a 16% win rate over a 5-month window. Different periods and counting rules explain the gap, but both land on the same conclusion: free signals underperform.

Backtest summary

  • Period08.09.2024 - 08.09.2025
  • Free signals tested624
  • Win rate23%
  • Total pips-12,994 pips
  • Signals/day1
  • Avg profit/week-249.88 pips
  • Avg holding time~8 hours
  • VerdictBack Testing Results: BAD

Best vs worst free signals

Best

+127 (EUR/JPY)+118 (USD/CAD)+112 (AUD/USD)+108 (EUR/USD)

Worst

-189 (GBP/JPY)-183 (GBP/USD)-178 (AUD/JPY)-175 (EUR/GBP)

The professional review also highlights engagement concerns: ~317k subscribers but ~10k views per post (~3.15% engagement), flagged as a possible authenticity issue alongside the negative performance.

3) Signals statistics by instrument (12-month dataset)

PairWin rateSignalsNet pips
EUR/USD25%52-964
GBP/USD20%52-1301
EUR/GBP19%52-1458
AUD/JPY22%52-1248
Other 8 pairsLow win rate52Negative (per source)

Every tracked pair in the verified-stats report ends negative for the year; the four listed pairs are examples and the other eight pairs follow the same pattern.

We do not recommend following these forex signals.

Both sources point to negative expectancy in the free feed. Use this article for awareness only; it is not trading advice.

4) Red flags (from both sources)

  • Low win rate: 16% (5-month pro review) and 23% (12-month verified-stats dataset).
  • Net negative results: -12,994 pips over the 12-month sample.
  • Engagement/authenticity concerns: ~317k subscribers but ~10k views/post (~3.15%).
  • Heavy promotion and upsell: broker promotion, related channels, and VIP sales via bot.
  • Low transparency: no named individual or verified trading history mentioned.
  • No free education content (no tutorials/analysis/strategy breakdowns) per the pro review.

5) Takeaway

  1. Large, very active FX signals feed centered on London session.
  2. Free feed posts ~1 signal/day with entry, SL, and three TPs; heavy marketing around VIP and broker offers.
  3. Stats: 624 free signals, 23% win, -12,994 pips (12-month dataset); alternate 5-month window shows 16% win.
  4. All tracked pairs finish negative in the verified-stats report.
  5. Bottom line: free signals do not show a positive edge despite the channel size and activity.